For Christmas I got an intriguing present from a good friend - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of simple triggers about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of writing, but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repeated hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, because pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can buy any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in anybody's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, produced by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is meant as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He intends to broaden his range, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we really imply human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And bphomesteading.com despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for imaginative purposes should be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without permission should be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very powerful but let's develop it morally and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - the BBC - have chosen to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to use creators' content on the internet to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening one of its finest carrying out markets on the unclear guarantee of growth."

A federal government representative stated: "No move will be made until we are definitely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them certify their material, access to high-quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a national information library consisting of public data from a vast array of sources will also be made available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the safety of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training information and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became the many downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It is complete of errors and hallucinations, akropolistravel.com and it can be quite difficult to read in parts because it's so verbose.

But offered how rapidly the tech is progressing, wiki.vst.hs-furtwangen.de I'm not sure for how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in international innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.